<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cash position &#8211; Sarah Schlott</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sarahgschlott.com/tag/cash-position/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sarahgschlott.com</link>
	<description>FP&#38;A Insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 04:48:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Cash Flow Forecasting: Why 13 Weeks Isn’t Always Enough</title>
		<link>https://sarahgschlott.com/cash-flow-forecasting-why-13-weeks-isnt-always-enough/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cash-flow-forecasting-why-13-weeks-isnt-always-enough</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Schlott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FP&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[13-week forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash Forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covenant compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liquidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runway visibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scenario planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working capital]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sarahgschlott.com/?p=4549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here’s the truth no one wants to admit: most 13-week cash flow forecasts are just glorified guesswork. We treat them like gospel because they’re standard. Safe. Palatable. But if you’ve ever had to explain a sudden shortfall to your CEO or board, you already know: Thirteen weeks is not a crystal ball. It’s a snapshot. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-pm-slice="1 1 []">Here’s the truth no one wants to admit: most 13-week <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/the-5-most-common-mistakes-i-see-in-financial-models-and-how-to-fix-them/">cash flow</a> forecasts are just glorified guesswork.</p>
<p>We treat them like gospel because they’re standard. Safe. Palatable. But if you’ve ever had to explain a sudden shortfall to your CEO or board, you already know:</p>
<p>Thirteen weeks is not a crystal ball. It’s a snapshot. And in volatile markets, snapshots are dangerous.</p>
<p>I’ve worked with companies that survived near-death events—missed funding rounds, supplier collapses, customer defaults. Not one of them said, “Thank God we had a 13-week <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/how-to-make-your-fpa-function-a-strategic-partner-not-a-reporting-machine/">forecast</a>.” They said, &#8220;We were lucky we saw it coming early.&#8221;</p>
<p>That’s the difference. Seeing it coming. Acting before the cliff, not on the way down.</p>
<h3>Why 13 Weeks Became the Standard</h3>
<p>It’s clean. It’s tidy. One quarter. Fits nicely on a <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/how-to-make-your-fpa-function-a-strategic-partner-not-a-reporting-machine/">spreadsheet</a>. And in stable environments, it’s often enough. You <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/how-to-make-your-fpa-function-a-strategic-partner-not-a-reporting-machine/">model</a> your ins and outs, watch your working capital, and assume the rest will work itself out.</p>
<blockquote><p>But let’s be honest:</p></blockquote>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>How often is your environment truly stable?</li>
<li>Are your customers really paying like clockwork?</li>
<li>Do your vendors never change terms?</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>Exactly.</p></blockquote>
<h3>The Risks Hiding Behind a 13-Week Horizon</h3>
<p>The biggest issue isn’t that 13 weeks is too short. It’s that it gives teams a false sense of confidence. You stop asking harder questions:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>What happens in week 14 when that tax payment hits?</li>
<li>What if our biggest customer delays their next invoice?</li>
<li>Are we tracking covenant compliance in six months?</li>
</ul>
<p>A 13-week forecast can lull you into comfort. And comfort is a dangerous place to live when your cash position is fragile.</p>
<h3>Funny But True: It’s Like Driving Cross-Country With Only a Quarter Tank Map</h3>
<p>Imagine planning a road trip from New York to LA using only the first 50 miles of <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/top-10-principles-for-transforming-fpa-towards-long-term-value-creation/">Google</a> Maps. Sure, you’ll get out of the city. But what about the Rockies? What about gas stations? What about construction?</p>
<p>That’s what 13-week cash forecasting does. It’s enough to get you moving, not enough to keep you alive.</p>
<h3>What High-Performing Teams Do Differently</h3>
<p>I’ve seen CFOs turn cash forecasting into a real strategic asset. Here&#8217;s how:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li><strong>Layered time horizons</strong>: 13 weeks for precision, 6-12 months for visibility.</li>
<li><strong>Scenario overlays</strong>: They ask &#8220;what if we miss bookings by 20%?&#8221;</li>
<li><strong>Working capital drills</strong>: Not just watching DSO/ DPO—modeling their movement.</li>
<li><strong>Bridge to operational metrics</strong>: Tying forecasts to sales pipeline, hiring plans, capex.</li>
</ul>
<p>When done right, a cash forecast becomes a control tower, not a rearview mirror.</p>
<h3>Quick Table: Why Teams Expand Beyond 13 Weeks</h3>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Forecast Horizon</th>
<th>Use Case</th>
<th>Risk Mitigated</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>13 Weeks</td>
<td>Liquidity precision</td>
<td>Missed AP/AR movements</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6 Months</td>
<td>Mid-term planning</td>
<td>Tax, payroll, short-term debt</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>12 Months</td>
<td>Strategic <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/the-5-most-common-mistakes-i-see-in-financial-models-and-how-to-fix-them/">runway</a> visibility</td>
<td>Fundraising, covenant breach</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Multi-Year</td>
<td>Capital allocation, M&amp;A</td>
<td>Long-term growth/investments</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>How to Extend Your Forecast Without Drowning in Data</h3>
<p>Going beyond 13 weeks isn’t about building a monster spreadsheet.</p>
<blockquote><p>It’s about:</p></blockquote>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Simplifying <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/the-5-most-common-mistakes-i-see-in-financial-models-and-how-to-fix-them/">assumptions</a> as you go longer</li>
<li>Aligning categories (not every vendor matters at 12 months)</li>
<li>Linking inputs to operations (not just <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/mastering-ai-in-finance-building-expertise-for-a-data-driven-future/">finance</a>)</li>
<li>Automating as much as possible (tools like Cube, Mosaic, etc.)</li>
</ul>
<p>You don’t need more tabs. You need more foresight.</p>
<h3>Common Excuses, and Why They Don’t Hold Up</h3>
<p><strong>&#8220;Our business is too unpredictable.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>That’s <em>why</em> you forecast longer. Uncertainty multiplies over time. Waiting means reacting.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Leadership doesn’t care beyond 13 weeks.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Then make them care. Show them how that new headcount plan impacts runway.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;We don’t have the data.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Perfect <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/mastering-ai-in-finance-building-expertise-for-a-data-driven-future/">data</a> is a myth. Directionally right is better than precisely wrong.</p>
<h3>What Great CFOs Know That Others Don’t</h3>
<p>Cash forecasting isn’t just about survival. It’s about leverage. When you can see farther, you can:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Negotiate better vendor terms</li>
<li>Plan strategic hires confidently</li>
<li>Time fundraising more effectively</li>
<li>Reduce executive stress</li>
</ul>
<p>Forecasting is a trust builder.</p>
<p>When you walk into a board meeting and <em>already know</em> what’s six months out, you’re not just a finance lead—you’re a <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/how-to-make-your-fpa-function-a-strategic-partner-not-a-reporting-machine/">strategic partner</a>.</p>
<h3>A Real Story (Without the NDA)</h3>
<p>A company I worked with had just secured a funding round. Flush with capital, they stuck to their 13-week cadence. But no one flagged the six-figure vendor escalation coming in month five. Because it wasn’t &#8220;in scope.&#8221;</p>
<p>By the time it hit, they had to scramble. Freeze hiring. Pause marketing. Explain to the board why their &#8220;fully funded&#8221; plan was already wobbling.</p>
<p>A simple 12-month model would’ve caught it. And it would’ve taken 2 hours to build.</p>
<h3>What to Do Next</h3>
<p>If your cash forecast stops at 13 weeks, ask:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>What would I do differently if I saw 6 months out?</li>
<li>Who’d I call earlier?</li>
<li>What lever would I pull today?</li>
</ul>
<p>Forecasting is optional. Running out of cash isn’t.</p>
<p>You don’t need to predict the future. But you <em>do</em> need to prepare for it.</p>
<p>Because when the road shifts—and it will—you’ll wish you packed a better map.</p>
<blockquote><p>Is your 13-week model a strategy or a seatbelt sign that never turns off?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
