<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Documentation &#8211; Sarah Schlott</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sarahgschlott.com/tag/documentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sarahgschlott.com</link>
	<description>FP&#38;A Insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 04:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>How to Build an Audit-Friendly Financial Data Pipeline with Excel Power Query</title>
		<link>https://sarahgschlott.com/how-to-build-an-audit-friendly-financial-data-pipeline-with-excel-power-query/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-to-build-an-audit-friendly-financial-data-pipeline-with-excel-power-query</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Schlott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 23:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit-friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial data pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Query]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traceability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Version control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sarahgschlott.com/?p=4604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let’s start with a truth no one likes to say out loud: audits don’t fail because the numbers were wrong. They fail because no one can prove they were right. I’ve seen it too many times. You’ve got a perfectly accurate board deck. A forecast that matches actuals to the penny. But when the auditors [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-pm-slice="1 1 []">Let’s start with a truth no one likes to say out loud: audits don’t fail because the numbers were wrong. They fail because no one can <em>prove</em> they were right.</p>
<p>I’ve seen it too many times. You’ve got a perfectly accurate board deck. A <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/how-to-make-your-fpa-function-a-strategic-partner-not-a-reporting-machine/">forecast</a> that matches actuals to the penny. But when the auditors come calling and ask, “Where did this number come from?” suddenly it’s three Slack threads, two undocumented <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/top-10-principles-for-transforming-fpa-towards-long-term-value-creation/">Excel</a> transformations, and one panicked analyst trying to remember what they did last month.</p>
<p>That’s why I tell every <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/scenario-planning-in-uncertain-times-a-practical-framework/">CFO</a> and FP&amp;A lead I work with: you don’t need better numbers. You need a better <em>pipeline.</em> One that’s transparent. Traceable. Documented. And yes—built in something as simple and powerful as Excel Power Query.</p>
<p>Here’s how to build an audit-friendly financial <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/mastering-ai-in-finance-building-expertise-for-a-data-driven-future/">data</a> pipeline with Power Query that reduces risk through consistency, version control, and clear documentation.</p>
<h2>Why Transparency, Traceability, and Documentation Matter</h2>
<p>When an auditor shows up, they aren’t looking for perfect numbers. They’re looking for <em>process integrity.</em></p>
<p>They want to see:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Where your data came from (source systems)</li>
<li>What transformations were applied (and why)</li>
<li>How outputs tie back to inputs</li>
<li>Who owns each step in the process</li>
</ul>
<p>The more of this you can automate and document, the lower your audit risk—and the higher your credibility with the board.</p>
<h2>The Anatomy of an Audit-Friendly Financial Data Pipeline</h2>
<p>An audit-friendly pipeline has five key attributes:</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Attribute</th>
<th>Why It Matters</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Transparent</td>
<td>Auditors can see all steps</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Traceable</td>
<td>Each number links to source</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Documented</td>
<td>Steps and logic are explained</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Consistent</td>
<td>Same process each cycle</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Controlled</td>
<td>Version control and ownership</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Power Query, when used right, supports all five. Here’s how.</p>
<h2>Step 1: Connect Directly to Source Systems</h2>
<p>First rule of audit-friendly pipelines: no more copy-paste.</p>
<p>Power Query allows you to:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Connect directly to ERP exports (CSV, Excel, database queries)</li>
<li>Pull data from CRM, HRIS, and other systems</li>
<li>Refresh data connections with one click</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Why this matters:</strong> Manual copy-paste introduces undocumented steps—an audit red flag. Direct connections create a clear, documented data lineage.</p>
<h2>Step 2: Keep a Raw Data Layer Intact</h2>
<p>Never overwrite raw data.</p>
<p>In Power Query, set up a “Raw” layer:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>First query pulls in unmodified data</li>
<li>Subsequent queries reference the raw layer</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Why this matters:</strong> Auditors often want to compare transformed data to raw source. Keeping the raw layer intact makes this painless.</p>
<h2>Step 3: Apply Documented Transformations</h2>
<p>Every step in Power Query is recorded in the Applied Steps pane.</p>
<p>Best practices:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Name each step clearly (e.g., “Remove Blank Rows,” “Normalize Department Names”)</li>
<li>Add comments in M code where logic is non-obvious</li>
<li>Use a README tab in your workbook to explain transformation logic at a high level</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Why this matters:</strong> If an auditor can’t follow your logic, you’ll spend hours defending it—or worse, redoing it.</p>
<h2>Step 4: Maintain a Clear Mapping Table</h2>
<p>For common transformations (like mapping old account codes to new ones), maintain a separate, version-controlled mapping table.</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Store this table in a controlled folder</li>
<li>Reference it in your Power Query steps</li>
<li>Document update dates and owners</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Why this matters:</strong> Hardcoding mappings into Power Query is brittle and opaque. A separate table makes changes auditable and transparent.</p>
<h2>Step 5: Automate Refreshes, but Document Versions</h2>
<p>Power Query can auto-refresh data. Great! But for audit purposes:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Record the refresh date in your outputs</li>
<li>Maintain an archive of prior versions (monthly snapshots)</li>
<li>Use version control tools (OneDrive, SharePoint, Git if you’re fancy)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Why this matters:</strong> Auditors may ask for <em>prior period</em> reports. If you can’t reproduce them exactly, your process looks unreliable.</p>
<h2>Step 6: Validate Outputs with Control Checks</h2>
<p>Before publishing outputs:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Reconcile totals to ERP reports</li>
<li>Cross-check key metrics (<a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/the-5-most-common-mistakes-i-see-in-financial-models-and-how-to-fix-them/">revenue</a>, COGS, headcount)</li>
<li>Document validation steps and results</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Why this matters:</strong> A clean pipeline still needs QC. Documenting control checks builds audit confidence.</p>
<h2>Step 7: Assign Ownership and Control Access</h2>
<p>Every pipeline needs an owner.</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Assign a named owner for each report/process</li>
<li>Limit edit access to core queries</li>
<li>Provide read-only access for consumers</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Why this matters:</strong> “We’re not sure who built this” is a phrase that triggers auditor concern instantly.</p>
<h2>Practical Examples: Where This Pipeline Shines</h2>
<p>Here are common areas where I’ve implemented this approach:</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Reporting Area</td>
<td>Common Risks Reduced</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monthly GL Reporting</td>
<td>Stale data, manual errors</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Board Metrics</td>
<td>Inconsistent <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/top-10-principles-for-transforming-fpa-towards-long-term-value-creation/">KPI</a> definitions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tax Provision</td>
<td>Unclear adjustments</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Multi-Entity Rollups</td>
<td>Misaligned COA mappings</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Audit Support</td>
<td>Missing documentation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Variance Analysis</td>
<td>Mismatched <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/implementing-zero-based-budgeting-in-fpa-a-10-step-guide/">budget</a> versions</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Compliance and Internal Audit Requirements</h2>
<p>Internal audit teams (and external auditors) typically look for:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Documented data flow from source to output</li>
<li>Evidence of control checks</li>
<li>Version history of reports</li>
<li>Segregation of duties (who builds vs. who approves)</li>
</ul>
<p>Building your pipeline this way makes you a <em>partner</em> to audit, not an obstacle.</p>
<h2>Why CFOs and Operators Should Care</h2>
<p>In the boardroom, trust is currency.</p>
<p>If your CFO can say:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>“Our reporting pipeline is transparent and auditable”</li>
<li>“We can reproduce any prior period report exactly”</li>
<li>“All transformations are documented and owned”</li>
</ul>
<p>That’s credibility. That’s risk reduction. That’s the difference between a green audit letter and a fire drill.</p>
<h2>Build Once, Sleep Better Every Cycle</h2>
<p>I wrote this because too many <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/mastering-ai-in-finance-building-expertise-for-a-data-driven-future/">finance</a> teams are still running reporting processes that are opaque, fragile, and undocumented. And every time they do, they’re adding audit risk and burning hours that could be spent on strategy.</p>
<p>Building an audit-friendly financial data pipeline isn’t about being fancy. It’s about building <em>trust.</em></p>
<p>Power Query—when used right—is one of the best tools we have for this. And every step you automate and document is a step toward a more resilient finance function.</p>
<p>If this article gave you new ways to think about reporting risk, please share it. I put real time into this because I want more finance pros building <em>trusted</em> processes, not just pretty reports.</p>
<p>And if you want to go deeper—whether it’s building smarter financial models, <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/the-5-most-common-mistakes-i-see-in-financial-models-and-how-to-fix-them/">scaling</a> your Excel and Power Query game, mastering custom <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/how-small-excel-tweaks-can-save-you-hours-in-month-end-reporting/">formulas</a>, or sharpening your career strategy—I offer one-on-one consulting for finance professionals ready to level up. DM me if you want to talk.</p>
<p>And here’s an unconventional thought to chew on: What if audit readiness wasn’t a compliance task—but your finance team’s <em>competitive advantage?</em></p>
<p>Are you building processes that survive audit—or ones that build trust long before the auditors arrive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
