<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sensitivity &#8211; Sarah Schlott</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sarahgschlott.com/tag/sensitivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sarahgschlott.com</link>
	<description>FP&#38;A Insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 04:47:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Advanced Excel Forecasting Models for CFOs: From Scenario Planning to Sensitivity Analysis</title>
		<link>https://sarahgschlott.com/advanced-excel-forecasting-models-for-cfos-from-scenario-planning-to-sensitivity-analysis/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=advanced-excel-forecasting-models-for-cfos-from-scenario-planning-to-sensitivity-analysis</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Schlott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 20:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cohort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inputs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scenario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensitivity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sarahgschlott.com/?p=4595</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let me tell you something about forecasting that doesn’t make it into the glossy investor decks: it’s less art, more street fight. Forecasting is what happens when you’re locked in a room with imperfect data, an impatient executive team, and the ticking clock of a quarterly board meeting. I’ve lived that loop more times than [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-pm-slice="1 1 []">Let me tell you something about forecasting that doesn’t make it into the glossy investor decks: it’s less art, more street fight. Forecasting is what happens when you’re locked in a room with imperfect <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/mastering-ai-in-finance-building-expertise-for-a-data-driven-future/">data</a>, an impatient executive team, and the ticking clock of a quarterly board meeting. I’ve lived that loop more times than I care to admit.</p>
<p>And if you’re the CFO or senior <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/mastering-ai-in-finance-building-expertise-for-a-data-driven-future/">finance</a> leader in that room, you don’t get to shrug and say, “Well, the market’s volatile.” They want direction. Precision. A story with guardrails.</p>
<p>That’s where advanced forecasting models in <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/top-10-principles-for-transforming-fpa-towards-long-term-value-creation/">Excel</a> come in. No, not the overgrown jungle of tabs built by someone who left the company last year. I mean the kind of models that are <em>alive</em>—adaptive, scenario-based, and transparently structured so you can explain them under fire.</p>
<p>Let’s walk through how to build and deploy forecasting models in Excel that don’t just predict the future, but <em>prepare</em> you for it.</p>
<h2>1. Build for Change: The Core Principle of Agile Forecasting</h2>
<p>If you’ve ever worked at a company where forecasts are rebuilt from scratch every quarter, you know what I mean when I say: most models aren’t built to flex.</p>
<p>Your forecast needs to absorb uncertainty without collapsing. That means:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Clear separation between inputs, <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/the-5-most-common-mistakes-i-see-in-financial-models-and-how-to-fix-them/">assumptions</a>, calculations, and outputs</li>
<li>Version-controlled base cases that you can clone and tweak</li>
<li>Dynamic named ranges (no hard-coded ranges that break when data shifts)</li>
<li>Drivers first, noise second: always prioritize the 3–5 metrics that actually matter</li>
</ul>
<p>Start with simplicity, then scale complexity only where you need it.</p>
<h2>2. Scenario Planning: The CFO’s Reality Check</h2>
<p>Executives love best-case scenarios. Until the market changes. Then they want to know what the downside looks like—and they want that answer now.</p>
<p><a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/implementing-zero-based-budgeting-in-fpa-a-10-step-guide/">Scenario</a> planning isn’t a deck. It’s a workflow. And Excel is still the best place to build it.</p>
<p>Set up your base model with toggles or a control panel where you can flex key inputs:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li><a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/the-5-most-common-mistakes-i-see-in-financial-models-and-how-to-fix-them/">Revenue</a> growth assumptions (flat, 5%, 15%, etc.)</li>
<li>CAC increases or decreases by channel</li>
<li>Hiring freeze vs. aggressive expansion</li>
<li>Gross margin pressure from vendors</li>
</ul>
<p>Here’s what it might look like:</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Scenario</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
<th>CAC Delta</th>
<th>Headcount Growth</th>
<th>Gross Margin</th>
<th><a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/the-5-most-common-mistakes-i-see-in-financial-models-and-how-to-fix-them/">Runway</a> Months</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Base Case</td>
<td>10%</td>
<td>0%</td>
<td>3%</td>
<td>60%</td>
<td>14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Optimistic</td>
<td>18%</td>
<td>-5%</td>
<td>5%</td>
<td>65%</td>
<td>20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Downside</td>
<td>4%</td>
<td>+10%</td>
<td>0%</td>
<td>55%</td>
<td>9</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>You don’t need 10 scenarios. You need 3 clear ones. The goal isn’t to simulate every future. It’s to pressure-test the present.</p>
<h2>3. Sensitivity Analysis: Where Risk Lives</h2>
<p>If scenario planning is the map, sensitivity analysis is the radar.</p>
<p>This is where we ask: which assumptions break us?</p>
<p>Use Excel’s Data Table feature to model how changes in one or two variables impact key outcomes like EBITDA, cash runway, or burn.</p>
<p>Set up a grid and feed it one variable at a time. Like this:</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>CAC Increase (%)</td>
<td>Cash Runway (months)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>-10</td>
<td>16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>0</td>
<td>14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>+10</td>
<td>11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>+20</td>
<td>9</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Want to impress the board? Show them which single metric, when off by 10%, costs the company 4 months of runway.</p>
<p>You don’t need complex add-ins. You need visibility.</p>
<h2>4. Rolling Forecasts: Stop Worshipping the Annual Plan</h2>
<p>I once worked at a company that celebrated their annual operating plan like it was scripture. We locked it in January, then spent the next 11 months explaining why it no longer made sense.</p>
<p>Rolling forecasts are how finance stops playing defense.</p>
<p>In Excel, you can build a 12-month rolling forecast that updates automatically as new months close. It should:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Pull actuals dynamically from your ERP or GL dumps</li>
<li>Roll forward monthly using the latest 3–6 month run rates</li>
<li>Allow inputs to adjust based on trends (e.g., seasonality or margin compression)</li>
</ul>
<p>It’s not about being perfect. It’s about being relevant. When you shift to a rolling model, your finance team becomes a forward-looking machine, not a backward-looking record keeper.</p>
<h2>5. Cohort Forecasting: When Averages Lie</h2>
<p>If you’re running a SaaS or recurring revenue business and still using average <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/the-5-most-common-mistakes-i-see-in-financial-models-and-how-to-fix-them/">churn</a> and LTV, please stop.</p>
<p>Cohort forecasting allows you to:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Model retention by acquisition month or source</li>
<li>Track margin by cohort</li>
<li>Forecast expansion and contraction more accurately</li>
</ul>
<p>In Excel, use pivot tables and index/match combos to group users by acquisition date and track their performance over time.</p>
<p>Here’s a very simplified table:</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Cohort (Start Month)</td>
<td>Month 1 MRR</td>
<td>Month 3 MRR</td>
<td>Month 6 MRR</td>
<td>Retention %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jan 2024</td>
<td>$20,000</td>
<td>$18,500</td>
<td>$16,200</td>
<td>81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Feb 2024</td>
<td>$25,000</td>
<td>$23,000</td>
<td>$21,000</td>
<td>84%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>When a board member asks why your churn is improving, this is how you show it without hand-waving.</p>
<h2>6. Capital Planning and Burn Modeling: Where Sanity Lives</h2>
<p>CFOs live in the land between strategy and solvency. If you’re not modeling burn and cash inflection points weekly, you’re flying blind.</p>
<p>Build a <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/the-5-most-common-mistakes-i-see-in-financial-models-and-how-to-fix-them/">cash flow</a> schedule that:</p>
<ul data-spread="false">
<li>Starts with revenue, then flows through expenses line by line</li>
<li>Separates fixed vs. variable costs</li>
<li>Flags runway, break-even point, and time-to-next raise</li>
</ul>
<p>And please—for the love of everything—stop using indirect cash flow methods for operating models. Direct is harder, but it’s honest.</p>
<h2>Stop Forecasting for Optics, Start Forecasting for Action</h2>
<p>Forecasting isn’t a <a href="https://sarahgschlott.com/top-10-principles-for-transforming-fpa-towards-long-term-value-creation/">PowerPoint</a> exercise. It’s your first line of defense.</p>
<p>And Excel—despite all the new tools and platforms—is still the sharpest weapon in the hands of a team that knows how to use it.</p>
<p>This wasn’t written to impress you with formulas. It’s to remind you that good forecasting doesn’t require a PhD. It requires structure, clarity, and the courage to look at the ugly version of the future—not just the polished one.</p>
<p>If this article helped shift how you think about financial planning, share it. I put real time into this because there are too many CFOs doing gymnastics in spreadsheets built on shaky logic. We can do better.</p>
<p>If you want to talk models, pressure-test an approach, or share your own forecasting war stories, my DMs are open.</p>
<p>And here’s something unconventional to chew on: What if finance isn’t about forecasting the future—but choosing the one we’re willing to build?</p>
<blockquote><p>Are you forecasting to feel safe? Or to make bold decisions before anyone else sees the cliff?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
